Magomedov Yaguzal Ramazanovich Biography

Petra 1, village of Makhachkala, pos. Zagorodny, today there was a court of lawsuits. Due to the criminal attitude of judges, these endless trials brought my family to ruin and material terms. Ultimately, my family is forced to evict on the street, having in hand all direct and indirect evidence not only about the fulfillment of obligations under the loan agreement to Khalidov, but also with a huge overpayment.

Khalidov was given to me by his own written receipt that there was also a notarized receipt from Hiriev that he transferred this money to Khalidov on behalf of my husband Hiriev should my husband and with the consent of Khalidov himself. The bailiff was recovered from my pension more than rubles and then transferred to Khalidov’s account, and as a result, instead of 5 rubles, according to the writ of execution from Khalidov, I received 5 five million seven hundred and sixty thousand rubles from me.

In November, Khalidov invited my husband to the Sharia court, which made a strange decision: to equate the debt that they took from Khalidov at the gold rate, and then it turned out that I owed Khalidov more than 7 rubles. There are notes in court decisions where Khalidov states that the Chariat Court awarded this money that he requires from me, and the witness from Khalidov confirms this there.

Based on all this, Khalidov seeks the fulfillment of the non -demand of the writ of execution from the trials of this more than once, but they do not pay attention to this. Khalidov endlessly appeals to the court with the claim that the duty was not fully fulfilled by me. In particular, Khalidov appeals to the Leninsky District Court of Makhachkala with a lawsuit about the inaction of the bailiffs.

But the Khalidov Makhachkala again with the claim for the inaction of the bailiff, and the judge of the Leninsky district court Dadaeva Patimat Abdurashidovna, instead of inviting Khalidov to file an appeal against the decision of the Leninsky District Court from but Judge Dadaeva appoints the trial against Makhachkala from the appellation, although she knew all this, left the decision of Leninsky The district court from the cassation appeal against this decision and the ruling written by me lay in the RD Armed Forces without consideration for almost three months.

They decided to return the case to the Leninsky District Court for re -examination by the same judge Dadaeva. The motive is that the money introduced by a third party of Hiriev is not a fact of the fulfillment of obligations to Khalidov, since Hiriev was not a party to the contract. These circumstances are not proved again and are not subject to contesting when considering another case in which the same persons participate.

Thus, I believe that Judge Dadaeva set herself above the law and violated it twice, exceeded her powers, and the appeal authority did not consider anything illegal in this. The cassation instance rejected my complaint against this decision and determination of the RD. This is how issues are resolved in the courts of the RD. In January of the year, I applied to the Kirovsky District Court of Makhachkala with a claim for the execution of obligations under the loan agreement to Khalidov and establishing the fact of overpayment, but in the Kirovsky district court, Judge Magomedov, Yaguzal Ramazanovich, stretched out the process for more than three months and issued a decision to refuse my claim, also referring to the adopted definition of the RD from and adds Motive from myself: according to p.

The arguments on the part of the plaintiff on the return of borrowed funds to the defendant in full when considering the case did not find his confirmation, since confirmation of the fulfillment of the obligation under the loan agreement is both the debt document from the debtor and such written evidence as a receipt of the lender in receipt of execution in full or in the part. What kind of nonsense is the judge Magomedov, because all Khalidov’s receipts issued to me and Khiriev that he received from me and Hiriev, the confirmation written by Khalidov, from the appellate, leaves this decision leaves this decision without change.

The cassation appeal I was filed by the Makhachkala, although in the cassation appeal there was a request to demand some cases from the archive of the Leninsky District Court of the city as I found out through my channels, not a single thing for this period from the archive of the Leninsky District Court was destroyed, and such a decision was made in such a hurry. As I later found out through my channels, the judge of the Kirovsky district court Magomedov Ya.

Khalidov has repeatedly boasted that he resolves any issues in the courts in the RD. In fact, it turns out. In different ships of the city of Makhachkala, trials on Khalidov’s lawsuits on the recovery of money under loan agreements issued to different people or the allections for their property in favor of Khalidov are regularly held. In almost all matters, decisions are made in his favor.Khalidov has been engaged in the fact that he gives loans to people at huge interest and at the same time, most likely, not a single penny of taxes pays to the budget from this activity.

Does this not say that corruption on a large scale is developed in the judicial system of the Republic of Dagestan? Is it permissible? A person who is given the right to perform the law, he violates it myself, I mean some judges? Do they have the right to believe the fate of people, how do they want?

After all, we have a legal state, which means that every citizen must have the right to justice. Sheikhaliev Abdula Sheikhalievich, a representative of attorney and husband Abdulmedzhidova J. This appeal was published in accordance with Art.